COMMUNITY: Is the income gap changing the face of Takoma Park?


The gap between the haves and have-nots in Takoma Park widened significantly during the last decade, according to U.S. Census data.

Community Health and Empowerment through Education and Research (CHEER), a local non-profit organization, analyzed the data and released a report showing that, as in other parts of the U.S., the middle class in Takoma Park is disappearing.

By comparing data from the 2000 Decennial Census to the most recent American Community Survey CHEER found that the number of upper-income households increased here by more than 50 percent over the last decade. Meanwhile, middle-income households declined, and lower-income households remained stable.

In Takoma Park, upper income is defined as $123,000 and above (120 percent of area median income), while middle income is in the range from $58,000 to $123,000. Lower income is below $58,000.

Kathy Porter, a former mayor of Takoma Park and a CHEER board member, sees the influence of city policy and housing prices on population trends. “We’ve had rent stabilization since the early 1980’s so we’re not losing our low-income renters, which is the good news,” she commented. However, because Takoma Park is a desirable location with close proximity to the District, many in the middle class are priced out of the housing. “That’s why we’re losing the middle,” she said.

Hank Prensky, a local real estate agent, concurred: “There’s activity at the extremes. There continues to be buyers at the lower end and higher end and maybe less in the middle.”

Bruce Baker, the director of CHEER, expressed concern that the trend could change the character of Takoma Park. “The city population is moving in a direction contrary to the goals of the community,” he said. “If we don’t do something, change will continue, and this could become the kind of place that the community has not envisioned for itself.”

Prensky holds out hope that because Takoma Park continues to promote policies and programs that keep living costs more affordable for renters and low-income homeowners, the city will remain a cultural and ethnic melting pot. “It’s what I see as Takoma Park’s great, solid, encouraging, positive values,” he said.

But Baker emphasized that a lack of middle-class housing means that people in apartment buildings who are saving up to buy a house will be less likely to find an affordable one in Takoma Park and are likely to move elsewhere.

A large majority of residents who were interviewed for CHEER’s first “report card” on housing said they favored trying to maintain a diversity of housing prices. One homeowner, Cindy Dyballa, said, “I would like if the people who live and rent here could also be able to purchase here. I don’t think Takoma Park has changed so much that it’s just a rich place, but I can tell that it is heading that way and that makes me uncomfortable.”

Another homeowner, Susan Wood, stated, “I can’t imagine how people who don’t already own a home can afford to purchase a home in Takoma Park. Ten years ago the price rise had just started. I don’t think we could buy here now.”

Porter also worries about the long-term repercussions. “The more different people are from each other, the harder it is to relate to each other,” she said. “I don’t want to see Takoma Park split in two.”

She acknowledged that finding a way to promote middle-income housing stock is not easy. “From a policy point of view, you can keep apartments affordable for tenants, but it’s a lot more difficult to preserve affordable home ownership opportunities. There are programs, but they tend to be a lot more expensive to do.”

Rent stabilization itself is controversial because it results in lost revenue to the city government. A policy to help middle-income homeownership would likely cause even greater controversy. However, Porter observed there might be considerable support for such a policy anyway. “We’re a community that values diversity. People moving in share that value. We already have a reservoir of good will.”

She added, “Our city government and organizations like CHEER want to make diversity work.”

— Lauren Hammer

1 Comment on "COMMUNITY: Is the income gap changing the face of Takoma Park?"

  1. Sandy Kozlen | November 10, 2011 at 5:16 am |

    In a way it looks like Tacoma Park is becoming a bi-modal community based upon the physical properties available and the employment attraction (University, Silver Spring and DC proximity). The apartment communities continue to be modest income locations, but the demand for area housing and living quality of Tacoma has caused the individual homes to be “bid up” as they turnover. An alternate strategy would be to give tax incentives to apartment owners to “up grade” their properties to improve the economics of the rental population, so more are within the middle class criteria.

    There is no reason that a community with the right attractions to people, cannot maintain a rich racial and cultural diversity while enjoying an improving economy. I just wish to offer the idea that there can be many conclusions surrounding demographic statistics and am certainly not heartless toward families in the below $58,000 income group. Increasing the proportion of middle income families could be done by improving some properties rather than downgrading others.

    Great article, interesting read and enjoyed it thoroughly because it cause me to do some thinking how we respond to demographic statistics. It made me wonder if a lack of multifamily housing quality is causing some of the building to lose middle income residents? Thank you

Comments are closed.